We recommend that numbered examples be avoided unless absolutely necessary, as these prove difficult at present to convert to HTML. By `necessary', we mean if there is a need to refer to examples by number in a discussion (rather than saying, e.g. ``Example (4) shows...''). There is a workaround, however it involves duplicating material within environments specific to LaTeX and HTML. Examples of how to do this follow.
The subject of an extraposition verb such as `bother' in (1) is a pleonastic element and cannot therefore be regarded as being semantically selected:
(1)![]() | It bothers Bill that Mary left |
The example was produced as follows:
The subject of an extraposition verb such as `bother' in (\ref{3ex1}) is a pleonastic element and cannot therefore be regarded as being semantically selected:
\enumsentence{\label{3ex1}It bothers Bill that Mary left}
\par \begin{tabular}{ll} \begin{equation} \mbox{\htmlimage{align=nojustify}.} \end{equation}\label{3ex1}\&It bothers Bill that Mary left} \end{tabular} \par
Note that this layout pattern must be adhered to strictly, particularly with respect to placement of labels. Note also the necessary `.' in the element:
\mbox{\htmlimage{align=nojustify}.}
The subject of a raising verb such as `seem' is either contentful or pleonastic (2) according to the complement's subject subcategorisation:
(2)![]() | Mary seems to be happy |
It seems to bother Bill that Mary left |
This was produced as follows:
The subject of a raising verb such as `seem' is either contentful or pleonastic (\ref{3ex3}) according to the complement's subject subcategorisation:
begin{latexonly}
\enumsentence{\label{3ex3} Mary seems to be happy\\ It seems to bother Bill that Mary left}
\par \begin{tabular}{ll} \begin{equation} \mbox{\htmlimage{align=nojustify}.} \end{equation}\label{3ex3}&Mary seems to be happy\\ ~&It seems to bother Bill that Mary left \end{tabular} \par
Note here the necessary tilde character in the first cell of the second row of the tabular. Note further that we cannot at present cope with examples that are sub-numbered (3a, 3b, etc.) as we cannot convert the LaTeX mechanism used for this to HTML. Thus, if you wish to refer explicitly to each sub-example, we recommend that you create separate numbered examples: one numbered example for each original sub-example, in an enumsentence/tabular environment of its own. Note that glosses may if necessary be numbered by adopting an approach similar to the one given here.