next up previous contents index
Next: type-value com Up: type-value prop Previous: type-value prop

Central semantic of value proper nouns

Graphical criterion

  1. Proper nouns may begin with an upper-case letter, but this is not a necessary condition. Furthermore, all nouns that begin with an upper-case letter are not proper nouns, for example names for inhabitants like Français, Africain, etc. or names for feast days like Pâques, are considered as common nouns (see for criteria below). Furthermore, upper-case letters occur on the words which begin a sentence and on emphazised words in titles or running text (l'Etat souverain). Consequently, this criterion is not sufficient and not necessary.

Test

If X begins with an upper-case letter, it may be a proper noun.

but:

Syntactic criterion

  1. Each noun that is incompatible with the definite article if the noun is in the singular form, and if it occupies the syntactical position of a subject without a specifying adjective, without a complement and without a restrictive relative phrase is a proper noun. In other words, proper nouns needs no other elements, like determiners, to occupy non-terminal phrases. Proper nouns have this behavior in common with pronouns, but proper nouns don't play the role of substituts for a nominal phrase. The opposite of this criterion is not true: each noun that occupies a nominal phrase with a determiner is not a common noun (example: les Alpes, see below). Notice also that in certain cases, the morphological unit le is part of the proper noun (example: Le Havre). This criterion is sufficient but not necessary.

Test

Given Det a determiner, NP a nominal phrase, If NP(Det+X+notY) or NP(Det+notY+X) with function:subject fails, X is a proper noun.

Semantic criteria

  1. Proper nouns are non descriptive nominals that denote single, individual objects. Remark: The common nouns like soleil, lune, terre, voie lactée also denote single, individual objects (for tests see below). If proper nouns are in the plural form, they denote several individuals/ objects which have the same name (tous les Martin de l'annuaire).

Test

Given X a noun that is a candidate for a proper noun, and given a descriptive nominal phrase NP, with both, X and the NP denoting the same object, If the coordination under the same NP fails, X can be a proper noun. Remark: this is not necessarily the case, if the common noun denotes a single object.

but:

Test

Given a descriptive nominal NP, and given X a noun that is a candidate for a proper noun, If the transformation of the apposition X into a relative phrase fails, X is a proper noun.

but:

Test

Given X a noun, If X cannot have predicative function, X is a proper noun.

but:

Test

Given X a noun, If X is a vocative, X is a proper noun.

Proper nouns are from a semantic point of view "transparent", or semantically not motivated. This means that no semantic structure underlies them. Nevertheless, proper nouns can be related to the semantic network either by morphosemantic relations (example: Paris - parisien), or via semantic features that they share with common nouns (example: vodka: alcoholic drink, ...). Proper nouns are also related to the semantic network through means of predicates like s'appeler, porter le nom, se nommer. These predicates can also be a common denominator for different proper nouns that denote the same object. Furthermore, the emergence of new proper nouns doesn't disorder the semantic organization of the existing lexical units, neither the paradigm of the proper nouns. Remark: The following tests are not really applicable to common nouns that denote single objects (example: soleil), to the names of the weekdays (example: lundi), to the names of feast days (example: Pâques) and to the names for inhabitants (example: Français). In contrast to proper nouns, these nouns have an underlying semantic or conceptual structure (soleil versus lune, terre versus ciel for example), they are semantically motivated (example: lundi means jour de la lune). Names for inhabitants are considered as common nouns because they predicate a property, that is the membership of a certain group of people. Furthermore, we can say that the weekdays and names of feast days and public holidays are integrated into a conceptual system, that is the calendar.

Test

Given X and Y nouns, If 'the synonym of X is Y', or 'the opposite of X is Y', etc., fails, X is a proper noun.

but:

Test

Given X, Y nouns, If 'the X are a class of X1, X2, etc.' fails, X is a proper noun.

but:

Remark: For common nouns, the plural form denotes a range of elements that belong to a given class, designated by the noun. The plural form of proper nouns denotes several entities of the same name.

Proper nouns can be defined in extension by the enumeration of semantic sub-classes to which they may belong.

type=prop
D e s c r i p t i o nE x a m p l e s
first namesPierre /type=prop  
last namesMeunier /type=prop  
names of regionsla Provence /type=prop  
names of townsParis /type=prop  
names of mountainsles Alpes /type=prop  
names of rivers, oceans etc.la Seine /type=prop  ,la mer Rouge /type=prop  
names of countriesla France /type=prop  
names of islandsl' ıle d'Elbe /type=prop  
names of planetsMars /type=prop  
names of companies, institutionsGSI-Erli /type=prop  , la C.A.F. /type=prop  
trademarks or product namesCoca-Cola /type=prop  
names of organisations, partiesLes Verts /type=prop  
names of fictive/mythological figures, epicsles Sirènes /type=prop   l' Iliade /type=prop  
names of buildingsle Louvre /type=prop  
names for historical events or military operations; regimsla Révolution française /prop  
names of streetsla rue Mouffetard /type=prop  
titles used as vocativesMaıtre /type=prop  
abbreviations of currenciesFF /type=prop  
capital lettersle A /type=prop  



next up previous contents index
Next: type-value com Up: type-value prop Previous: type-value prop